Investing without compromise
Mr.Green, how has the direct lending business developed at HSBC Asset Management?
In 2019, I moved from the banking side into HSBC Asset Management to establish the direct lending part of the business. We started with a UK-domiciled direct lending strategy. That went well, and now we’ve diversified into a European strategy. We’ve made quite a few investments and ma- naged to deploy the capital quickly. Now we have a team of 20 people in our group. In total, we’ve raised just under 3 billion US-Dollars as of June 2025 across the strategies.
How do you maintain discipline in your approach?
What we observe is a very competitive market with low M&A volumes impacting deal volumes. This has manifested itself in market trends including spread compressi- on, more aggressive terms and increasing leverage ratios. This environment requires strong discipline in both deal selection and structuring, with no compromise on our investment criteria. Through our work with HSBC Bank, we benefit from broad market access and a strong pipeline of proprietary deal flow, which allows us to be highly selective and deliver strong risk adjusted returns for our investors.
Can you elaborate?
We benefit from a flow of transactions coming across our desk from HSBC Bank. HSBC is one of the largest banks in Europe and has a strong presence in leveraged finance markets across the continent. We have a memorandum of understanding with the bank to have an exclusive first look at their pipeline. That provides us with lots of opportunities to choose from. More than 50 percent of the deals we’ve closed across the whole platform have been proprietary. This is where we come back to the obligation of being disciplined. We can invest without having to compromise on our investment criteria because we have this large set of opportunities coming to us through the HSBC network.
You mentioned discipline in structuring the portfolios too. What do you mean by that?
We focus on “bank-style” structuring. We do deals with lower leverage, robust covenants and documentation. Both are important, because covenant erosion has been a big trend in the market. We also make sure the documentation protects us. At entry, documentation doesn’t matter so much but if a deal goes wrong, everyone looks at the contract. In our euro-denomi- nated portfolio, the average opening debt- to-EBITDA is 3.3x. This is significantly lower compared to the broader European market, where average leverage was probably 5.2 to 5.5x within the last 12 months. This means we are structuring deals at materi- ally lower leverage levels while still achie- ving average margins of over 500 basis points. And most importantly, our docu- mentation allows the team to sleep at night because it’s properly negotiated.
What makes the European mid-market as a whole so attractive for you?
The direct-lending market in Europe has really matured. Today you can do a deal at 1 million euro EBITDA, or at 500 million euro EBITDA. And there’s a direct lender ready to cover that ticket size. It’s the same across the risk curve: You find managers for very conservative deals and for riskier transactions. We focus on deals below €100 million. This segment offers good value. Transactions aren’t overcrowded, and we can structure them with lower leverage. We specifically like the lower mid-market, where we benefit from HSBC’s strong franchise.
What implications does the geopolitical situation have on your business model in Europe?
We are always alive to macro-economic trends and geopolitical issues when it comes to the potential for impacts on our portfolio. Factors we have considered recently included tariffs but also before that, exposure to inflationary risks, risks and opportunities from AI, and exposure to emerging risks such as cybersecurity. Generally our view is that direct lending is not GDP correlated and has proven to be well insulated from the wide range of geopolitical headwinds that have emerged over the last 5 years. The revenue growth we see in our portfolio proves that we can pick businesses growing far faster than the economies they operate in.
Key risks of investing in Alternatives
The value of investments and income from them can go down as well as up, meaning you may not get back the amount invested and you may lose some or all of your investment. Past performance information presented is not indicative of future performance. The return and costs may increase or decrease as a result of currency fluctuations.
- Liquidity risk – Investors may be unable to dispose of an investment quickly or at all and at a price that’s closely related to recent similar transactions, if any. There is no guarantee of distributions and secondary market is expected to be established
 - Event risk – A significant event may cause a substantial decline in the market value of all securities
 - Long-term horizon – Investors should expect to be locked-in for the full term of the investment, which is subject to extensions
 - No capital protection – Investors may lose the entirety of invested capital
 - Unpredictable cashflows – Capital may be called and distributed at short notice
 - Economic conditions – Ability to realize/divest from existing investments depends on market conditions and the regulatory environment
 - Risk of forfeiture – Failure to make call payments could result in forfeiture of commitment, including invested capital, without compensation
 - Default risk – In the event of default investors risk losing their entire remaining interest in the vehicle and may be subject to legal proceedings to recover unfunded commitments
 - Alternatives – There are additional risks associated with specific alternative investments within the portfolios; these investments may be less readily realisable than others and it may therefore be difficult to sell in a timely manner at a reasonable price or to obtain reliable information about their value; there may also be greater potential for significant price movements
 
The risk factors listed above are not exhaustive.